Tony Heller (AKA “Steve Goddard”) is regurgitating submarine balderdash for the umpteenth time.
Under the headline “No Change In Arctic Sea Ice Over The Past 60 Years” Tony asserts:
Sixty years ago this week, the USS Skate surfaced at the North Pole. Arctic sea ice was two meters thick.
using these images as “evidence”:
Please note that according to the July 1959 issue of National Geographic magazine:
The winter sun still hid below the horizon last March 17 when USS Skate crunched up through the ice at 90° N – first ship in history ever to surface at the Pole.
Note also that when USS Skate surfaced at the North Pole on March 17th 1959 she was alone. There was no polynya to be seen, let alone a second submarine in one.
What do you suppose the odds are that Tony’s “No Change In Arctic Sea Ice Over The Past 60 Years” assertion is equally aberrant?
A reader on Twitter, apparently a fan of Mr. Heller asks:
So, is there any change in Article sea Ice over the last 60 yrs, which was the title of the post?
— Jim Fisher (@JimFish56837379) August 18, 2018
Of course there is! According to Commander James Calvert in the May 1959 edition of LIFE magazine:
On March 17 we arrived in the vicinity of the geographic North Pole. We had a job we very much wanted to do here, but as we cruised back and forth in the darkness below the Pole it seemed doubtful that we would be able to perform the last service requested by Sir Hubert Wilkins. No frozen leads or polynyas appeared. For a time I thought it would be necessary to conduct the service while submerged and discharge the ashes from one of the torpedo tubes as we passed under the pole.
Then suddenly we spotted the faint light of a small lead and we started up. This was our toughest surfacing so far. The quarters were cramped and we had to take special care not to hit Skate’s delicate rudder against the walls of ice. It took us two hours of careful maneuvering before Skate’s sail buckled the ice at the precise top of the world.
Climbing to the bridge I was greeted by an awesome sight. Skate was in a small lead completely surrounded by 10-foot-high hummocks of ice. This was the most inhospitable terrain we had seen so far.
The Skate and Seadragon surfacing at the North Pole meme has just been resurrected by David Middleton at “Watts Up With That”. He asserts that:
The North Pole may not have been totally ice free in 1962, but there clearly was a lot of open water…
quoting the United States Navy:
USS SKATE (SSN 578), CDR Joseph L. Skoog (Dr. W.K. Lyon and Richard Boyle), and USS SEADRAGON (SSN 584), CDR Charles D. Summitt, (Walter Wittman) conducted the first rendezvous of 2 ships at the North Pole.
Unfortunately for Mr. Middleton, Commander Summitt wrote a book about his experiences, the relevant section of which reads as follows:
When we were a couple of miles from the pole, we started watching for a large enough polynya to hold both of us. However, we reached the pole without either of us having any luck.
Quod erat demonstrandum?
I’d say those odds are astronomical.
I’d settle for “infinite”!
See today’s update above to start with.
I would say it is BS.
all year he has been posting the DMI volume and DMI thickness charts as evidence ‘nothing is happening’ and ‘volume higher than in years’. Both look WAY out compared to other measures to me????
Agreed Griff,
See the eyewitness reports from Helen Czerski aboard Oden for example.
I’ll have more to say on this topic in due course, but not tonight (BST)!
Work on your history. The March voyage of the Skate was her second, deliberately chosen to surface under the ‘worst’ conditions, to see if it could be done. The earlier voyage, in August, was timed for maximum opportunity for success. When the article above says ‘the first to surface’, it refers to the Skate itself, not this incident. For contemporary detail see this link:
http://archives.nbclearn.com/portal/site/k-12/flatview?cuecard=41751
I’m familiar with the history Taylor. At the risk of repeating myself, with added emphasis:
It’s referring to “the scattering of Wilkins’ ashes” incident. Skate didn’t surface “at 90° N” in August 1958, when according to Commander Calvert:
Yes Jim I’ve lost count how many times I’ve had to put people straight about this. The photo of the Skate on the surface on the polynya is probably when they surfaced at Ice Station Alpha the previous March.
When describing his view on emerging on the bridge when the Skate broke through the ice in March Calvert wrote: “The Skate was the first ship in history to be on the surface at the geographic North Pole.”
Hi Phil,
I suspect you meant “they surfaced at Ice Station Alpha the previous August”?
Yes, indeed.
??
Hi Doug,
In answer to your terse question, stuff and nonsense!
Here’s an extract from a more reliable source. Chapter 4 of Commander James Calvert’s memoir “Surface at the Pole”:
etc. etc.
Just because Mr. Heller repeatedly posts the same image with the same erroneous caption doesn’t magically make it true. Perhaps the same applies to many of his other oft repeated assertions as well?
Funny how the basic fact of surfacing a submarine at the North Pole seems to be ignored. Today that condition its seen as a portent of doom, yet its been and gone and the world goes on. Meh
Hi Yarpos,
Ignored by whom?
At the risk of repeating myself: